Saturday, September 29, 2012

Week 5 Reflection



I was not looking forward to the Information Literacy Quiz.  I really don’t feel that I’m all that tech savvy.  However, I was pleasantly surprised by my results.  I scored a respectable 8, meaning I am “somewhat savvy”.  I must admit, I don’t know that I would have scored that well had I not read the article first.  I am certain the article helped boost my score.   Still, this was a fun exercise that did boost my ego a bit.
In order to complete the week’s activities, I followed the link to “Victorian Robots” (www.bigredhair.com ).  The URL ends in .com which indicates that this is a company website.  Using the name “big red hair” in the URL also may help researchers to see that perhaps this is not the most scholarly of websites.  At this point I realize that I probably cannot take everything this site presents as complete truth or fact.  A company can present information however they choose.  Using the link command, I see that the links provided are all to sites that the “Victorian Robots” creators have created.  Some links lead to more information about each individual robot.  There are links to extend the information presented about each robot creation, but there are also more artistic websites linked.  Some of the sites are personal.  There are links to the creators’ Halloween party invitations and pictures, dog website.  These links lead me to believe that I cannot take this website too seriously.  I can see that the authors of the website are artistic and interesting but not historically accurate. 
I did conduct a search for the topic “Victorian robots” on Google, Yahoo, Bing and HotSpot.  I wanted to use HotSpot because I have never used this search engines before.  www.bigredhair.com was the first hit on each search engine.  This is perhaps due to the fact that there are no references to Victorian robots that truly existed.   As I used the different search engines, I noticed more advertisements on Yahoo than any other search engine.  I found them moderately distracting.  I believe this is due to the way the search engines earn money.  Some of these engines earn money when advertisements are placed on the page; some earn money when advertisements are clicked. 
The authors of the “Victorian Robots” websites are Paul Guinan and his wife Anina Bennett.  Both authors are artists and writers.  The artists are incredibly creative and have not formal publisher, other than themselves.  They are solely responsible for their many sites.
The website’s purpose was originally entertainment.  However, the website may seem to represent true, historic data about actual robots in the Victorian era.  Though the authors originally created this website as entertainment, it became something of an experiment once they realized that people believed in the Victorian-era robots they created.  As quoted on WikiPedia, Paul Guinan said 
“Certainly I felt happy about having achieved my goal," he said. "I put this thing across as trying to be real, and people bought into it. So, that's a success! But, as an amateur historian, I feel a responsibility to get the story right. So I felt bad about some of these people being hoaxed. It was a mixed bag." "But," he revealed, "I thought, if I was getting this reaction and I wasn't really trying, then what would happen if I really tried?" (Dooley 2002) .    
I conducted this process on a few websites I use regularly.  The sites I normally use are all academic, educational sites that I use for work.  Evaluating the sites really helped me see that the few sites I use frequently are great resources, created for educational purposes by knowledgeable educators.  I don’t really use the internet for any purpose other than work, so I didn’t find sites that were not reliable.  This process will help me evaluate the validity of websites I intend to use in the future.  I also shared this process with my husband, and he has already begun evaluating websites he uses.

No comments:

Post a Comment